As Google’s legal dispute intensifies, OpenAI, Perplexity AI, and Yahoo have indicated interest in purchasing Chrome. Here are some possible implications for the web’s future.
Google and the US Department of Justice are battling in court over claims that the business is unlawfully retaining its market dominance in search engines. The DOJ is pushing for Google to divest itself of some of its most valuable assets, such as the Chrome browser. The hearings are anticipated to last three weeks, with the second week ending on Friday. They started on April 22.
Numerous IT businesses, including Yahoo, Perplexity AI, and OpenAI, have expressed interest in the Chrome proposal and are eager to buy Chrome should the court order its sale.
Both how consumers obtain answers to their internet search inquiries and how tech businesses do business may be altered by the ruling. In their opening remarks, government attorneys argued that Google ought to be compelled to offer Chrome, the web browser that directs users to the Google search engine.
At the time, attorney David Dahlquist of the Justice Department stated that Google ought to be compelled to assist other search engines that it has unjustly excluded from competition.
According to The New York Times, Dahlquist stated, “Now is the time for the court to tell Google and all other monopolists who are out there listening, and they are listening, that there are consequences when you break the antitrust laws.”
Table of Contents
Google counters
In order to make Google the default search engine for smartphones and other devices, Google’s attorneys argue that any remedies should solely take into account Google’s agreements with businesses like Apple, Mozilla, and Samsung.
“Google won its place in the market fair and square,” according to NBC News, quoting Google lawyer John Schmidtlein.
Executives from significant tech and AI firms have been testifying before US District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Amit P. Mehta, who is now hearing arguments.
Mehta is supposed to issue remedies by the end of the summer after hearing arguments.
According to GlobalStats, Google now dominates internet search with a global market share of over 89%, a tiny decrease from 91% last summer.
Google’s online statement prior to the start of the hearings was cited by a Google spokesperson to CNET. According to Lee-Anne Mulholland, vice president of the corporation, such broad fixes will hurt the US economy.
Mulholland refers to the case as “a backwards-looking case” and claims that the DOJ’s plan would hinder customers’ access to their chosen services, prohibit the firm from engaging in fair competition, and compel Google to divulge users’ private search queries to other businesses.
OpenAI, Perplexity and Yahoo want to buy Chrome
Nick Turley, an OpenAI official, stated in his testimony early in the trial that if Google is compelled to sell the Chrome browser, his business would be interested in purchasing it.
According to Reuters, he also stated that OpenAI’s artificial intelligence chatbot, ChatGPT, is “years away from its goal of being able to use its own search technology to answer 80% of queries.” Additionally, Turley testified that Google rejected OpenAI’s request to integrate Google search technology into ChatGPT.
Yahoo and Perplexity AI have also indicated interest in purchasing Chrome.
Dmitry Shevelenko, the chief business officer of Perplexity, expressed interest in purchasing Chrome in court.
Brian Provost, Yahoo’s global manager of search, also stated in his testimony that his organization is considering purchasing Chrome. The Verge claims that although Yahoo has been working on its own browser prototype, it thinks that acquiring Chrome will increase its search market share more quickly.
DOJ launches second antitrust push against Google
In an effort to restore fairness to the internet ad market, the DOJ is also pursuing a parallel antitrust case against Google, which includes forcing the company to sell over its publisher ad server business and ad exchange tools. The DOJ claims that the internet giant used illegal means to exclude competitors from the digital ad marketplaces, which are where online advertisements are purchased and sold.
After hearing arguments from Google and the Justice Department about potential remedies in the case, US District Judge Leonie Brinkema scheduled the trial for September 22. According to the corporation, these divestitures would damage publishers, which would then hurt internet consumers.
Potential outcomes
A number of things might happen to Google, including the company’s dissolution. The company’s Android smartphone operating system and Chrome browser businesses may be shut down if such a punishment were implemented.
The Department of Justice seeks to stop Google from signing exclusive contracts that set its search engine as the default on hardware and browsers. In an effort to level the playing field, the DOJ also wants Google to provide competitors access to specific customer data.
Since its failed attempts to dissolve Microsoft twenty years ago, this would be the first time the government has attempted to demolish a business due to illegal monopolization concerns.
Additionally, Google may be compelled to provide competitors access to its data or renounce the business agreements that made Google the default search engine on gadgets like the iPhone.
Could Google settle?
“I have a gut feeling that Google will make some concessions,” Chirag Shah, a professor at the University of Washington’s Information School, told CNET. The Chrome browser, Google’s agreements with Apple and other companies for the default search engine position, and the ad business, where Google has a monopoly and vast amounts of data, are the three main topics of discussion. “The question is, what would be a worthy settlement for both sides?” Shah remarked, referring to the US Federal Trade Commission, “because I don’t think the FTC is going to get it all.”
According to Shah, OpenAI, Microsoft, and Apple have all profited from Google’s popularity yet are direct rivals of the search engine behemoth, calling them “frenemies.”
Then there are businesses like DuckDuckGo, which provides a search engine that prioritizes privacy. That kind of search engine has long been confined by Google’s hegemony. “I wonder how much attention is being paid to that now,” Shah remarked.
However, he stated that Google is still the dominant force in the search industry.
“As far as the traditional search goes, yes, Google is practically the only player,” Shah stated. “There is no other way to explain it when you have a 90% market share. Such an imbalance does not occur in many product categories. Additionally, it’s a really difficult environment to enter and thrive in as a newbie. I don’t think anybody will be able to overcome the dozens of businesses that have come and gone in the foreseeable future.”
Why does this all matter?
Not just Google is dealing with legal troubles. Antitrust cases are also pending against Amazon and Apple, two significant tech corporations. Meta, the company behind Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp, is facing an antitrust trial that started on April 14.
The emerging era of artificial intelligence may potentially be impacted by the Google experiment. The Justice Department has stated that it anticipates Google would utilize its AI technologies to further expand its monopoly if sanctions are not imposed on the business.
Additionally, there have been changes in presidential administrations after the August trial. The hearings indicate that the Trump administration plans to monitor the evolving tech sector, as reported by The New York Times.
Do people switch from default search engines?
Google paid Apple and other businesses to set its search engine as the default on gadgets like Apple’s iPhone, which was the main focus of the August lawsuit. Google has stated that customers may switch their device defaults to use alternative search engines and that it does not maintain a monopoly through such arrangements.
In his October testimony, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that the notion that users switch between search engines is “completely bogus” and that “defaults is the only thing that matters in changing search behavior.”
Nearly 90% of web searches are conducted through Google, according to the Justice Department, although the business contests that statistic, the Times said.
In essence, corporate monopolies are prohibited by the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which forbids actions that limit interstate trade and market competition. It is the cornerstone of US antitrust laws, which resulted in the dissolution of Gilded Age industrial titans by the federal government in the late 19th century.